By Charlotte Vigy and Allison Fecke | ShoQs 2026
Over 7.5 million U.S. businesses now exist inside a single app, TikTok. What started as a platform for short-form video has become a marketplace where Gen Z’s daily scrolling leads straight to transactions. Adobe reports that one in two TikTok users have made an impulse purchase of at least $100 based on influencer content. Oxford Economics puts the platform’s contribution to U.S. GDP at $24.2 billion in 2023. Beneath the casual flow of “get ready with me” clips is an economic engine that is quietly reshaping how advertising works and how a generation decides what to buy.
The scale of this shift shows up most clearly in the labor market. A 2023 Oxford Economics study found that TikTok supports roughly 4.7 million U.S. jobs, with more than 3.1 million tied directly to content creation

and account management. In total, 7.5 million American businesses employ 28 million workers across the platform’s commercial ecosystem. About 74% of businesses say TikTok has helped them increase sales, open new locations, or expand their workforce. When a product goes viral, the effects travel far beyond the phone screen, but through creators, manufacturers, logistics networks, and retail firms alike.
What makes this possible is speed. TikTok’s algorithm picks up on patterns of interest before users are consciously aware of them, compressing the gap between desire and purchase. For Gen Z, buying something no longer starts with a search, it now starts mid-scroll. That shift changes how firms think about demand. Rather than waiting for consumers to come looking, companies depend on TikTok to surface products in a way that feels incidental but is built on dense data tracking. Attention is the scarce resource, and creators are competing for it.
Businesses have taken note. 42% of U.S. business owners plan to invest in TikTok Shop in the coming year, and another 19% intend to scale what they’re already doing. During Black Friday 2023, TikTok Shop and its creator ecosystem drove over $100 million in sales, with roughly 30,000 livestreams focused mainly on beauty, fashion, and home goods. Marketing budgets are shifting toward interactive formats where content and commerce operate in the same place at the same time.
That integration has made it harder to tell genuine expressions apart from paid promotion. Much of TikTok’s commercial influence flows through micro-creators who come across as peers, not spokespeople. Their recommendations feel like tips from a friend rather than a sales pitch, which lowers the perceived risk of clicking “buy.” Consumers feel like they stumbled onto something, when in reality, the discovery was engineered by an algorithm trained on every tap and pause.
TikTok’s commercial logic also invites an unlikely comparison to the informal black market economy – not in legality, but in structure. Both operate outside traditional retail channels. Both run on trust networks rather than institutional credibility. And both succeed by making consumers feel like they’re getting access to something the mainstream market isn’t offering. Where black markets move goods through word-of-mouth referrals, TikTok moves them through algorithmically amplified peer recommendations. The mechanism differs; the underlying psychology is strikingly similar.
Traditional black markets exist because formal channels fail to meet demand, whether due to price, regulation, or scarcity. Economists estimate the global shadow economy represents 10–13% of global GDP (Medina & Schneider, 2019). TikTok Shop works in reverse by generating demand that didn’t exist, then filling it instantly. Yet both share a disregard for the deliberate, research-driven consumer journey that traditional retail assumes. In a black market, a buyer trusts a contact over an institution. On TikTok, a viewer trusts a creator over an ad. The middleman has changed; the bypass of formal gatekeepers has not.
There is also a parallel in regulatory uncertainty. Black markets operate in legal gray zones; TikTok has spent years under threat of bans, data privacy investigations, and congressional scrutiny. Despite that instability, businesses have continued to invest heavily, much like operators in informal markets who calculate that the upside outweighs the risk of a shifting environment.
The key difference is scale and visibility. Black markets are defined by their exclusion from official economic measurement. TikTok’s $24.2 billion GDP contribution is tracked, taxed, and treated as a success story. What began as underground commercial logic (sell through networks, cut out the middleman, move fast on trust) has been industrialized and brought into the open. TikTok didn’t invent informal commerce, but formalized it.
The rise of TikTok makes clear that digital life is no longer peripheral to the economy. It is central to how products move, how marketing budgets get spent, and how a new generation assigns value. Attention has become a market of its own, and TikTok sits at the center of that exchange. Its commercial logic: fast, social, peer-mediated, algorithm-driven, echoes dynamics long found in informal economies, now operating at a scale that puts them squarely in the mainstream.
Sources
Adobe. (2023). TikTok commerce and impulse purchasing behavior among Gen Z users. Adobe Digital Insights.How TikTok Shopping Influencers Shape Consumer Decisions | Adobe
Medina, L., & Schneider, F. (2019). Shedding light on the shadow economy: A global database and the interaction with the official one. CESifo Working Paper No. 7981. CESifo Group Munich. Shedding Light on the Shadow Economy: A Global Database and the Interaction with the Official One
Oxford Economics. (2023). TikTok’s economic impact in the United States. Commissioned by TikTok. TikTok: Helping grow small and midsized businesses and deliver value for consumers across the United States | Oxford Economics
TikTok for Business. (2023). TikTok Shop Black Friday 2023: Performance and creator ecosystem report. TikTok Newsroom. TikTok Shop Kicks Off Its Biggest Black Friday Ever – Newsroom | TikTok
U.S. Small Business Administration. (2023). Small business and social commerce: Adoption and outcomes. SBA Office of Advocacy. Small Business Economic Profile US
Zhu, F., & Liu, Q. (2018). Competing with complementors: An empirical look at Amazon.com. Strategic Management Journal, 39(10), 2618–2642. amazon_2018-06-05_4a83c515-af0c-4366-9fba-8fb059d0b4f6.pdf